JHU
W-L: ( 8- 4) PR = 96.1360Schedule/Results All Games
Date Opponent Conf/State (W-L, PR) Score 202 H Rob Morris (12- 3, 90.9) 17- 2 210 H Towson (10- 3, 95.2) 13-11 214 H Loyola ( 9- 5, 93.7) 13- 7 220 A No Carolina (11- 3, 98.4) 9-17 228 A Virginia ( 8- 6, 97.1) 14-13 307 H Syracuse (11- 4, 98.1) 8-12 314 H Navy ( 7- 7, 93.3) 14-10 321 H Michigan ( 5- 8, 93.8) 14- 8 329 A Rutgers ( 8- 7, 93.3) 8- 9 404 H Penn St ( 7- 5, 98.2) 11-10 411 A Ohio State (10- 4, 95.0) 6- 7 418 H Maryland ( 7- 5, 96.9) 9- 8 430 N Michigan ( 5- 8, 93.8)
PREDICTION LIST
-------------------------------------
|Real = actual goal margin |
|Pred = predicted goal margin |
|+ = slightly above prediction |
|++ = above prediction |
|+++ = well above prediction |
|- = slightly below prediction |
|-- = below prediction |
|--- = well below prediction |
|Goals* = Goals over (+) under (-) |
| prediction. N/A when ten |
| goal limit is exceeded |
|n/a = Outside division |
-------------------------------------
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals*
202 H Rob Morris 17- 2 15 7 0.41
210 H Towson 13-11 2 2 -0.30
214 H Loyola 13- 7 6 4 + 2.20
220 A No Carolina 9-17 -8 -4 - -3.41
228 A Virginia 14-13 1 -2 + 3.32
307 H Syracuse 8-12 -4 -1 - -3.35
314 H Navy 14-10 4 4 -0.14
321 H Michigan 14- 8 6 4 + 2.37
329 A Rutgers 8- 9 -1 1 - -2.49
404 H Penn St 11-10 1 -1 1.79
411 A Ohio State 6- 7 -1 0 -0.81
418 H Maryland 9- 8 1 1 0.41
|
UNDER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 220 A No Carolina 9-17 -8 -4 - -3.41 307 H Syracuse 8-12 -4 -1 - -3.35 329 A Rutgers 8- 9 -1 1 - -2.49 |
OVER-ACHIEVED GAMES
Date Opponent Score Real Pred +/- Goals* 214 H Loyola 13- 7 6 4 + 2.20 228 A Virginia 14-13 1 -2 + 3.32 321 H Michigan 14- 8 6 4 + 2.37 |
JHU Evaluation
The team that earns the point in the pair-wise comparison is based on three criteria:
first is head-to-head, the winner gets the point, however, if they did not play each
other, than it considers w-l versus common opponents. If their records are tied or they
have no common opponents, than the tie-breaker becomes the better power rating.
The Common Opponent Point list in the table below has the record of the winner followed by the
record of the loser for all common opponents
| Opponent | Who Gets the Point? | Head-2-Head Point |
Common Opponent Point |
Power Rating Point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Air Force | JHU | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Albany | JHU | JHU | ||
| Army | Army | insuffient: ( 3- 2)( 4- 1) | Army | |
| Bellarmine | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | JHU | |
| Binghamton | JHU | JHU | ||
| Boston Univ | JHU | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | JHU | |
| Brown | JHU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Bryant | JHU | JHU | ||
| Bucknell | JHU | JHU 3- 0 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Canisius | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Cleveland St | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Colgate | JHU | JHU 4- 1 vs 1- 4 | ||
| Cornell | Cornell | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | Cornell | |
| Dartmouth | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Delaware | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Denver | JHU | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | JHU | |
| Detroit | JHU | JHU 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Drexel | JHU | JHU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Duke | Duke | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Duke | |
| Fairfield | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Georgetown | Georgetown | tied - ( 1- 2) ( 1- 2) | Georgetown | |
| Hampton | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Harvard | Harvard | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 2- 1) | Harvard | |
| High Point | JHU | JHU 2- 2 vs 0- 4 | ||
| Hobart | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Hofstra | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Holy Cross | JHU | JHU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Iona | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Jacksonville | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 2)( 0- 3) | JHU | |
| Lafayette | JHU | JHU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Le Moyne | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Lehigh | JHU | tied - ( 3- 0) ( 3- 0) | JHU | |
| LIU | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 1)( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Loyola | JHU | JHU | ||
| Manhattan | JHU | JHU | ||
| Marist | JHU | JHU | ||
| Marquette | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Maryland | JHU | JHU | ||
| UMass | JHU | JHU | ||
| UMassLowell | JHU | JHU | ||
| Mercer | JHU | JHU | ||
| Mercyhurst | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Merrimack | JHU | JHU | ||
| Michigan | JHU | JHU | ||
| Monmouth | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Mt St Marys | JHU | JHU | ||
| Navy | JHU | JHU | ||
| NJIT | JHU | JHU | ||
| No Carolina | No Carolina | No Carolina | ||
| Notre Dame | Notre Dame | Notre Dame 5- 1 vs 3- 3 | ||
| Ohio State | Ohio State | Ohio State | ||
| Pennsylvania | JHU | tied - ( 0- 2) ( 0- 2) | JHU | |
| Penn St | JHU | JHU | ||
| Princeton | Princeton | Princeton 4- 1 vs 2- 3 | ||
| Providence | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Queens | JHU | JHU | ||
| Quinnipiac | JHU | JHU | ||
| Richmond | Richmond | tied - ( 2- 0) ( 2- 0) | Richmond | |
| Rob Morris | JHU | JHU | ||
| Rutgers | Rutgers | Rutgers | ||
| Sacred Heart | JHU | JHU | ||
| Siena | JHU | JHU | ||
| St Bonnies | JHU | tied - ( 1- 0) ( 1- 0) | JHU | |
| St Johns | JHU | tied - ( 0- 1) ( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| St Josephs | JHU | tied - ( 1- 1) ( 1- 1) | JHU | |
| Stony Brook | JHU | JHU 2- 1 vs 0- 3 | ||
| Syracuse | Syracuse | Syracuse | ||
| Towson | JHU | JHU | ||
| UMBC | JHU | JHU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Utah | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Vermont | JHU | JHU | ||
| Villanova | JHU | insuffient: ( 2- 1)( 1- 2) | JHU | |
| Virginia | JHU | JHU | ||
| VMI | JHU | JHU 2- 0 vs 0- 2 | ||
| Wagner | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU | |
| Yale | JHU | insuffient: ( 1- 0)( 0- 1) | JHU |
PowerWise = 64
division Games OnlyAverage number of games used in Games Correction = 13.40
Date Opponent (W-L PR) SCORE SAFE SAFE Home No Games SCI
Loss Win Field Correction Points
SLP SWP Advantage Factor
0 H Rob Morris (12- 3, 90.9) 17- 2 -9.03 12.26 -1.32 1.12 24.43
15 H Towson (10- 3, 95.2) 13-11 -4.74 16.55 -1.32 1.12 34.02
23 H Loyola ( 9- 5, 93.7) 13- 7 -6.24 15.05 -1.32 1.12 30.67
24 A No Carolina (11- 3, 98.4) 9-17 -1.50 19.79 1.32 1.12 -0.10
3 A Virginia ( 8- 6, 97.1) 14-13 -2.77 18.52 1.32 1.12 44.33
7 H Syracuse (11- 4, 98.1) 8-12 -1.80 19.49 -1.32 1.12 -1.74
6 H Navy ( 7- 7, 93.3) 14-10 -6.58 14.71 -1.32 1.12 29.91
7 H Michigan ( 5- 8, 93.8) 14- 8 -6.08 15.22 -1.32 1.12 31.04
5 A Rutgers ( 8- 7, 93.3) 8- 9 -6.57 14.72 1.32 1.12 -2.93
20 H Penn St ( 7- 5, 98.2) 11-10 -1.66 19.63 -1.32 1.12 40.90
18 A Ohio State (10- 4, 95.0) 6- 7 -4.89 16.40 1.32 1.12 -1.99
12 H Maryland ( 7- 5, 96.9) 9- 8 -3.03 18.26 -1.32 1.12 37.84
------
266.37
|
winning pts = 273.1328 losing points = -6.7673
SCI ={(SLP or SLW) +/- home-field advantage} * Game Correction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
| (W-L PR) = Won-loss record and power rating |
| SCORE = game score |
| SAFE Loss (SLP) = Points deducted for losing to the opponent |
| SAFE Win (SWP) = Points awarded for defeating the opponent |
| Home-field Advantage = goals deducted/awarded for site |
| No games correction = normalzation based on a ~16 game schedule |
------------------------------------------------------------------------